Monday, December 5, 2016

EDU 6130 Course Reflection



EDU 6130 Course Reflection                           Ian Lewis                                             December 5, 2016

Physical, emotional, and intellectual well-being are all taken into account by effective teachers when creating a learning environment that is safe and inclusive. Two elements of the Learning Environment program standard emphasized during this course are 5.1 Component 2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport and 5.4 Component 2d: Managing Student Behavior by Establishing Expectations. While a teacher proficient in creating an environment of respect and rapport creates an age and culture appropriate environment where teacher-student interactions are friendly and demonstrate general caring and respect, a distinguished teacher’s interactions reflect genuine respect and caring, not just for individuals, but the class as a whole. What sets a distinguished teacher apart from a proficient teacher with regard to establishing expectations to manage student behavior is that while standards are clear to all students in both scenarios, the distinguished teacher incorporates student input and development into the creation and implementation of standards of conduct.

Within my internship experience so far, many ideas discussed in this course relating to establishing classroom environments based out of respect, rapport, and high expectations for student behavior and learning success have been applied. First and foremost, as was likely mentioned in this class at least once per meeting, the importance of relationships is one of the shiniest, golden keys for success. Especially with building a classroom environment based out of respect and rapport, the idea of positive relationships is paramount. In order to promote diversity and cultural competency, positive relationships not only with students, but their families and communities, are incredibly valuable. With culturally competent teaching practices in place, a teacher can gradually incorporate more background knowledge of student diversity into everyday teaching and learning activities, fostering a learning environment built around mutually established respect and rapport. Wong’s discussion of what appear to be trivialities, for example, the importance of pronouncing and using names properly, and teaching and emphasizing “please” and “thank you” (1998, p. 69-76) are actually quite important to creating a positive classroom environment. On the first day of school, for example, I made a point to ask a certain Muslim student to say his name for me a few times so I would not ever mess it up. Later, during the social studies unit on the spread of the Muslim Empire, after further building a relationship with this student, I consulted with him on pronouncing certain words and cities, even allowing him to guide the class, which resulted in great enthusiasm and engagement on his part, and that of his peers.

Another strong way in which my mentor teacher advised me in creating relationships in order to create a positive classroom environment was through student and parent reflection. For the first quarter, students reflected on their progress, goals, and adherence to the model classroom characteristics Friday of each week, and also had a parent/guardian comment and sign the reflection sheet. With a reflection sheet as a vehicle, a positive web of relationships was created between student, parent/guardian, and teacher. If students and/or parents had noted concerns, my mentor teacher and I addressed them to the best of our abilities. In most instances, we simply commented on the positive results of tracking self-reflection and encouraged the students to continue. In addition to how relationships are key in creating a classroom environment of respect and rapport, student behavior management also relies on positive relationships with students.

As mentioned of the program standards before, distinguished educators incorporate student input when establishing standards of conduct. This was done at the beginning of the year in my classroom not only with my home room students, but the students of my teaching partner as well. Together, the two classes of students voted on a list of top ten behavior characteristics necessary for classroom success. With their input in creating a list of guiding principles for the class, our relationship and trust increased immensely. In addition to the PBIS rules of BE Respectful, Responsible, and Safe, our list of characteristics for success is prominently displayed in class. In addition to the PBIS rules, our own set of characteristics is often referenced when necessary. In order to further make standards clear to all students, immediate response to rule violations is necessary, as promoted by Wong (1998, p. 157). However, there are also certain situations where delayed consequences may be useful in order to not disrupt the flow of direct instruction, as discussed by Fay and Funk (1995, p. 44). Various contexts may call for different approaches to discipline, but as long as expectations and outcomes to violations are clear, we set up enforceable ways to manage student behavior through established expectations.

Overall, it has been an interesting experience to be simultaneously learning classroom management strategy by the books and in class/online while also engaged in a field experience daily. There is certainly no better way to gain experience in classroom management than to live it, which is one of the reasons I chose this program, with its extensive field internship experience. While numerous classroom management strategies seem to work in my field experience, some do not. That is not to say, however, they could not work in the future, in a different context. Each year anew, then, it will be interesting to experiment with which strategies are most effective with certain students in specific situations.

Reference List:

Fay, Jim and Funk, David (1995). Teaching With Love and Logic. Golden, CO: The Love and Logic Press Inc.

Wong, Harry K., and Wong, Rosemary T. (1998). The First Days of School. Mountain View, CA: Harry K. Wong Publications, Inc.

Sunday, December 4, 2016

EDU 6134 Course Reflection



EDU 6134 Course Reflection                              Ian Lewis                                             December 4, 2016

The standard of Professional Practice relates to how teachers work collaboratively within educational communities. In successfully collaborating, teachers reap the benefits of improving instruction, advancing knowledge and passion* of the teaching profession, and engaging students successfully and deeply in learning. The elements of Professional Practice, 8.1 Participating in a Professional Community and 8.2 Growing and Developing Professionally act in harmony. Effective participation in professional communities is characterized by relationships of mutual support and cooperation. In order to grow and develop as educators, feedback from colleagues, supervisors, and professional collaboration should be welcomed, as well as provided if needed. By having positive relationships with colleagues, administration, support, and more importantly students and families, individual teachers are better equipped to receive feedback and critique. They are likely more willing to provide it to peers and professional communities. This is in part because the interwoven relationships work together to provide a latticework of support for all players involved. Ultimately regarding student success, such a web of positive support structures allows for students to receive support from various people in multiple contexts of daily life.

With application to the various ideas presented throughout this course, including beginning teaching, protecting students (re: confidentiality, abuse/neglect, youth violence, substance abuse prevention, suicide prevention, mental health and disability awareness and law, and acts of unprofessional conduct), and continuing to better public education (through professional development and professional education association activity), the effectiveness of positive relationships and the link with positive application of peer feedback is thoroughly embedded.

As beginning teachers experience Moir’s (2011) phases, for instance, positive relationships and response to feedback would be especially essential for making it through the hurdles of the “Survival Phase” and “Disillusionment Phase”. Collaboration and positive response to feedback, built stronger via positive relationships, suits student interest with regard to protecting students from abuse, violence, suicide, and other traumatic situations. Systems are in place for protecting students in cases of abuse, violence, and for suicide prevention, as discussed by Denton (n.d.A; n.d.B), and they are effective because they are built on collaborative efforts and foundations of mutual support. Finally, as educators practice daily, no two experiences are the same, and thus there is always opportunity for continued learning in the classroom. Professional development, whether in or out of the classroom (e.g. hallway discussion and seminars; co-teaching/mentoring and group discussions/planning, examples provided by Desimone, 2011) allows for increasing knowledge base, which if applied well to best practices should positively influence student engagement and growth, the ultimate goal. By becoming better at an individual level, the overall professional community is strengthened. Positive relationships with professional communities, including the exchange of feedback, are necessary to better meet the needs of students and better public education as a whole.

Throughout the various aspects of this course, it is evident that there is a mutual bond between establishing positive professional relationships and being accepting of feedback. Both of these aspects of professional development work together to effectively shape how teachers interact within professional educational communities to improve instruction, advance knowledge, practice, and passion of the teaching profession, and better reach students to help them learn.

* I meant to write “practice”, but “passion” fits as well – maybe even better.

Reference List:

Denton, David (n.d.A). Issues of Abuse. Video.

(n.d.B). Issues of Abuse and Distress. Video.

Desimone, Laura M. (2011). A Primer on Effective Professional Development. Kappan, 92(6): 68-71.

Moir, Ellen (1990). Phases of First-Year Teaching. California New Teacher Project. California Department of Education.

Sunday, November 27, 2016

Multiple intelligence theory and student evaluation within internship



EDU 6160 bPortfolio Post 8                            Ian Lewis                                 November 27, 2016

Multiple intelligence theory and student evaluation within internship



The Response to Intervention (RTI) framework for instruction-based assessment discussed by Shermis and Di Vesta (2011, p. 399-404) is an individualized process for student assessment and intervention. It relies heavily upon the idea of zone of proximal development (Vygotskyy, 1978), which drew upon Piaget’s theories of child cognitive development and developmental stages, in that it emphasizes the individual level of student need and how the teacher provides instruction, while considering differentiation in order to meet standards for quality instruction. However, as the discussion of student essay assessments shows (Shermis and Si Vesta, 2011, p. 477-478), teaching to a basic framework, does not necessarily equate to passing more rigorous assessment, which suggests that good teachers need to teach beyond standards. Aspects of the RTI framework can be seen at NVI, and have been applied within my internship. Differentiation in both ELA and social studies is part of everyday instruction. 

In both ELA and social studies, various students would fall into the Tier 2 and Tier 3 of the RTI framework (Shermis and Di Vesta, 2011, p. 401), needing either systematic/remedial instruction or small group/individualized instruction. Some of these students are ELL and some receive special education services with 504 plans. Special attention is taken with planning and with implementation of instruction in order to meet the needs of all students based on their developmental level (linguistically, cognitively, socially, etc.).

Examples of differentiation in ELA are varied. Scaffolded summary paragraphs instead of writing a complete paragraph are used. Individual and small group support is provided especially when writing paragraphs, and soon essays. When answering questions, certain parts may be eliminated or reduced (or added) for students/classes. Providing supplemental material or copies of notes can be useful. Reducing multiple choice options and restructuring short answer prompts are ways to differentiate assessment. If the assessment asks students to use the text to cite specific examples in the story “Rikki-Tikki-Tavi” where suspense builds as a result of Rikki speaking with another character, this could easily be modified to ask a student to provide a single example. Similar strategies are used in social studies as well. Such differentiation all ties back to an understanding of multiple theories of intelligence and their application with our student population.

In order to go beyond the basic standards, as noted with the student essay tests anecdote (Shermis and Di Vesta, 2011, p. 477-478), we also seek to incorporate various effective practices for helping students exceed standards. As noted above, we are soon teaching/writing essays in 7th grade ELA, and just as the basic paragraph structure was taught, we have also taught a basic essay structure. However, each paragraph (with basic structure emphasized) practice activity built upon an additional, different element (e.g. citing multiple/different types of sources, providing background information before an introduction, expanding sentences to increase sentence fluency, etc.) that will hopefully contribute to taking students beyond basic. When students write their essays, the rubric uses a scaled score of 1-4 (based on 32 points for various essay elements), where 3 is meets standards, and 4 is exceeds. Strict adherence to a writing formula may allow students to meet a standard (and some may also still be approaching, 2). Integrating strategies such as varying sentence structure and fluency so that imagery and detail go beyond the basic script and add flowing, vibrant voice to writing, however, begins to exceed standards. Across the whole essay writing process, as with writing paragraphs, special attention will be directed to students with special needs to ensure they receive the necessary instruction and resources in order to be successful.


Reference List:

Shermis, Mark D. and Di Vesta, Francis J. (2011). Classroom Assessment in Action. Rowman and Lanham: Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Vygotsky, (1978). Interaction Between Learning and Development. Gauvain and Cole (Eds.) Readings on the Development of Children. New York: Scientific America Books. P 34-40.

Sunday, November 20, 2016

Summary of Most Recent Statewide Test




EDU 6160 bPortfolio Post 7                            Ian Lewis                                 November 20, 2016

Summarize the most recent statewide test for a grade level of your choosing, noting any peaks and valleys on subscores.

The University Place School District (UPSD) uses the Smarter Balanced Assessment (SBAC) to assess students in math and English Language Arts (ELA). The topic of test scores has been the discussion at various district, multi-school, and individual school meetings. As background information regarding the district, there is just one other intermediate school in addition to Narrows View. Traditionally, it has been the case that the other school has scored higher on the SBAC than Narrows View. It would also be of importance to note that while both schools are equally diverse, the other school has regularly served a smaller percentage of students with free/reduced lunch than Narrows View (OSPI 2016).

At one of the first staff meetings, we were given the district SBAC score summary for % meeting standard for 2015 and 2016, and instructed to briefly review and analyze them before discussing our findings in small groups. I pointed out that, as traditionally was the case, the scores for the other school (grades 5, 6, and 7) were an average of approximately 5% higher than those of Narrows View. However, I also pointed out that, while the other school’s scores were consistently higher, they were also rather consistent of not growing much year to year. In contrast, Narrows View scores showed higher growth of % meeting standard between years. For the ELA SBAC scores for the seventh grade, for example, Narrows View increased from 72.9% meeting standard in 2015 to 81% meeting in 2016 (8.1% growth) while the other school decreased from 83.8% meeting standard in 2015 to 81% meeting standard in 2016; overall, between all grades and over the course of two years, the increase in % meeting standard at Narrows View was 14.3%, while that of the other school was less than half this increase, at 6.3%. Such a pattern may be the result of any one or more of various factors.

While the other school is generally higher across all grade levels with % meeting standard, this higher percentage may represent a plateau. While students may be above grade level, they then do not appear to progress further. The overall higher average of % meeting standard may be a result of smaller % of students with free/reduced lunch. The lack of growth between years could represent multiple situations. Student diversity across years could be a factor. So too could be less effective teacher presentation of material and differentiation practices. While lower students at the other school may be higher in comparison to those at Narrows View, it may be possible that less effective teaching and differentiation strategies contribute to a stagnation of progress. Despite the lower percentage of % meeting standard, Narrows View shows greater growth, which could suggest teaching strategies are more effective, or student engagement is higher, or both, because one tends to cause the other. Thus, this is something to appreciate and continue to try to replicate. With higher scores as a district in general in comparison to other neighboring districts, UPSD places certain value on high stakes testing such as SBAC. As discussed by the guest speaker last class, Dr. Bishop, these tests provide useful data if we use the data wisely. It’s one thing to just note scores as higher than others. It’s another thing to differentiate and analyze trends in the data and create a reflective discussion about how/why such patterns exist and what can be done to change or replicate them.

Reference List:

OSPI (2016). School Report Card. Electronic source,
< http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/summary.aspx?schoolId=2157&OrgType=4&reportLevel=School >, accessed November 20, 2016.